β³ AJAX β Synchronous vs Asynchronous Requests: What’s the Difference?
π§² Introduction β Why Understanding AJAX Request Types Matters
When building interactive websites, understanding the AJAX request model is critical. Whether you’re submitting a form, loading live data, or building a real-time dashboard, choosing between synchronous and asynchronous requests impacts both performance and user experience.
In this guide, weβll break down what synchronous vs asynchronous requests mean in AJAX, when to use each, and why asynchronous AJAX is the preferred standard in modern development.
π― In this article, you’ll learn:
- What synchronous and asynchronous AJAX requests are
- How they affect user interaction and browser performance
- When each should (or shouldnβt) be used
- Real examples with code and explanations
π What Is a Synchronous AJAX Request?
A synchronous AJAX request blocks further code execution until the server responds. That means the browser freezes and becomes unresponsive until it receives a response from the server.
π« Why This Can Be Problematic:
- The page stops responding during the request
- Bad for user experience on slow networks
- Deprecated in modern JavaScript (
XMLHttpRequest.sync
is discouraged)
π§ͺ Example β Synchronous Request:
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open("GET", "data.json", false); // β false = synchronous
xhr.send();
console.log(xhr.responseText); // This line waits for the request to finish
π Explanation:
false
inxhr.open()
makes the call synchronous- JavaScript halts execution until the request finishes
- Browser UI may become unresponsive during the wait
β‘ What Is an Asynchronous AJAX Request?
An asynchronous AJAX request allows the script to continue running while the request is processed in the background. This is the default and recommended mode for AJAX.
β Why Itβs Preferred:
- Non-blocking β the UI remains responsive
- Fast and smooth user experience
- Compatible with modern JavaScript (including Promises and async/await)
π§ͺ Example β Asynchronous Request:
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (xhr.readyState === 4 && xhr.status === 200) {
console.log(xhr.responseText); // Only runs when response is ready
}
};
xhr.open("GET", "data.json", true); // β
true = asynchronous
xhr.send();
π Explanation:
true
enables asynchronous behavior- Callback
onreadystatechange
listens for the response - Browser remains usable while waiting for server
π Synchronous vs Asynchronous AJAX β Comparison Table
Feature | Synchronous Request | Asynchronous Request |
---|---|---|
Blocking Behavior | Yes β browser halts | No β runs in background |
User Experience | Poor (UI freeze) | Smooth and responsive |
JavaScript Execution | Waits for server to respond | Continues while waiting |
Recommended Use | Rarely, for critical operations | Always for web apps |
Modern Support | Deprecated in browsers | Fully supported |
Example Use Case | Logout or final payment trigger | Chat apps, live search, filtering |
π When Should You Use Synchronous Requests?
While synchronous requests are largely discouraged, they may still be acceptable in very rare edge cases such as:
- β οΈ Ensuring final logout action before page close
- π§Ύ Forcing blocking validation in legacy systems
However, these use cases are almost always better solved asynchronously today using Promises
, async/await
, or modern frameworks.
π§ Best Practices for AJAX Requests
β
Always use asynchronous mode unless you have a very specific blocking requirement.
β
Use fetch()
API instead of XMLHttpRequest
for cleaner asynchronous code.
π Example Using fetch()
(Asynchronous by default):
fetch("data.json")
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => console.log(data))
.catch(error => console.error("Error:", error));
π Summary β Recap & Next Steps
Choosing between synchronous and asynchronous AJAX requests affects the responsiveness, usability, and speed of your web app. While synchronous may offer simplicity, asynchronous is faster, safer, and standard for modern development.
π Key Takeaways:
- Synchronous requests block the browser and reduce UX quality
- Asynchronous requests run non-blocking, keeping the UI responsive
- Always prefer
fetch()
or asynchronousXMLHttpRequest
for modern apps
βοΈ Next Steps:
- Learn how to handle AJAX errors and timeouts
- Explore
async/await
withfetch()
for cleaner async code - Integrate AJAX into real-world projects like search boxes, forms, and dashboards
β FAQs β AJAX Synchronous vs Asynchronous
β Whatβs the main difference between synchronous and asynchronous AJAX?
β
Synchronous AJAX waits (blocks) for the server response, freezing the browser. Asynchronous AJAX continues execution while the request is processed in the background.
β Why is synchronous AJAX deprecated?
β
Because it blocks the browser, making the page unresponsive. Most modern browsers show warnings or block synchronous calls on the main thread.
β Can I use async/await
with AJAX?
β
Yes! You can use async/await
with the modern fetch()
API for clean, readable asynchronous code.
async function loadData() {
const res = await fetch('data.json');
const data = await res.json();
console.log(data);
}
β Are there performance differences?
β
Asynchronous requests are much more efficient, especially for real-time apps, because they do not interrupt the UI thread.
β Is fetch()
better than XMLHttpRequest
?
β
Yes. fetch()
is more modern, promise-based, easier to read, and handles asynchronous logic better than the old XMLHttpRequest
API.
Share Now :